The US Commerce Department has decided to revoke the license of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) to supply technology to Huawei for use in China. The move comes amid ongoing tensions between the US and China over national security concerns and trade issues.
TSMC, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, had previously been granted a special license to supply certain technology to Huawei, which has been on a US trade blacklist since 2019. The license revocation means that TSMC will no longer be able to provide chips to Huawei for its Chinese operations.
In response to the decision, TSMC stated that it will comply with the new regulations and is evaluating the impact on its business. Huawei, on the other hand, expressed disappointment with the move, stating that it could harm the global industry ecosystem and ultimately hurt US interests.
The US Commerce Department justified its decision by citing national security concerns and the need to protect sensitive technologies from being used for military purposes. This latest development is likely to further escalate tensions between the US and China, as both countries continue to spar over technology, trade, and security issues.
Overall, the revocation of TSMC’s license to supply Huawei is a significant development in the ongoing tech war between the US and China, with potential implications for the global semiconductor industry.
Sources Analysis:
US Commerce Department – The department has a vested interest in protecting US national security and technology from being used for military purposes. It may be biased towards American interests in this situation.
TSMC – As a major player in the semiconductor industry, TSMC’s statements may be influenced by its business interests and the need to comply with regulations to maintain its market position.
Huawei – Being directly impacted by the decision, Huawei may have a bias towards protecting its business interests and challenging US restrictions.
Fact Check:
The decision to revoke TSMC’s license – Verified fact. This information is based on a public announcement by the US Commerce Department.
Huawei expressing disappointment – Verified fact. Huawei’s response was reported in various news sources.
Reason for the decision citing national security concerns – Unconfirmed claim. While this is the stated reason, it cannot be independently verified without further information or evidence.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “US revokes TSMC’s licence on China-bound tech”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.