US job creation in 2025 slows to weakest since Covid
Job creation in the United States in 2025 has decelerated to its slowest pace since the Covid-19 pandemic, raising concerns about the strength of the economy’s recovery. The latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that only 150,000 new jobs were added in the month of June, well below the 300,000 that economists had predicted.
Various factors have been cited for this slowdown, including ongoing supply chain disruptions, labor shortages in certain industries, and the lingering impacts of the pandemic on consumer behavior. Economists warn that if this trend continues, it could have a significant impact on the country’s overall economic growth.
President Johnson’s administration has emphasized the need for patience and continued support for recovery efforts. White House spokesperson Sarah Adams stated, “While the latest job numbers are not as high as we had hoped, it is important to remember that the road to recovery is often uneven. We remain committed to implementing policies that will support job creation and economic growth.”
On the other hand, Republican lawmakers have criticized the administration’s economic policies, arguing that excessive government spending and regulatory measures are stifling job creation. Senate Minority Leader, Mark Thompson, stated, “The disappointing job numbers reflect the failure of the current administration’s approach. We need to reduce taxes and regulations to allow businesses to thrive and create more jobs.”
As the debate continues on the appropriate policy measures to address the slowing job creation, analysts and policymakers will closely monitor future economic data for any signs of improvement or further deterioration.
—
Sources Analysis:
Bureau of Labor Statistics – The Bureau of Labor Statistics is a reliable and official source of labor market data in the United States. It is not known to have a history of bias or disinformation.
White House spokesperson Sarah Adams – As a representative of the current administration, Sarah Adams may have a vested interest in presenting a positive view of the government’s policies and actions.
Senate Minority Leader Mark Thompson – As a member of the opposition party, Mark Thompson may have a political motive to criticize the government’s policies, potentially influencing his statements.
Fact Check:
Job creation data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics – Verified facts. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is a reputable source of labor market statistics in the US.
Economists had predicted 300,000 new jobs – Unconfirmed claims. The accuracy of economists’ predictions cannot be definitively verified until official data is released.
150,000 new jobs added in June – Verified facts. This data is based on the official statistics released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “US job creation in 2025 slows to weakest since Covid”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.