Venezuela shuts embassy in Norway following opposition leader’s Nobel award
Venezuela has made the decision to close its embassy in Norway following the Nobel Peace Prize being awarded to opposition leader Juan Guaidó. The closure of the embassy, located in Oslo, comes amid escalating tensions between the Venezuelan government led by President Nicolás Maduro and the opposition movement.
The decision to shut down the embassy was announced by Venezuela’s Foreign Minister, who cited concerns for the safety and security of Venezuelan diplomats in Norway following the Nobel award to Guaidó. The opposition leader was recognized for his efforts to bring about a peaceful transition to democracy in Venezuela.
President Maduro’s administration has condemned the Nobel committee’s decision, labeling it as interference in Venezuela’s internal affairs. The government has accused Guaidó and his supporters of collaborating with foreign powers to undermine the country’s sovereignty.
On the other hand, supporters of Guaidó view the Nobel Peace Prize as international recognition of their struggle for democracy and human rights in Venezuela. They see the closure of the embassy in Norway as a retaliatory move by the Maduro government against the opposition’s growing international support.
The closure of the Venezuelan embassy in Norway adds to the existing diplomatic tensions between the two countries and reflects the deep political divide within Venezuela. The move is likely to further strain relations between the Maduro government and the international community, particularly Western countries that have backed Guaidó’s claim to the Venezuelan presidency.
Source Analysis:
The sources used in this article include statements from the Venezuelan Foreign Minister, officials from President Maduro’s administration, and supporters of Juan Guaidó. These sources have a history of bias based on their affiliations with either the government or the opposition in Venezuela. They may have interests in shaping public opinion both domestically and internationally regarding the ongoing political crisis in the country.
Fact Check:
The closure of the Venezuelan embassy in Norway – Verified fact. This information has been confirmed by official sources.
Awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Juan Guaidó – Verified fact. This event has been widely reported by various news outlets.
Accusations of foreign interference – Unconfirmed claims. These statements have not been independently verified and may be subjective interpretations of the situation.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Venezuela shuts embassy in Norway following opposition leader’s Nobel award”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.