In a recent development in Taiwan, a vote targeting “pro-China” lawmakers has caused significant division within the country. The incident took place on (date) in the (location) Parliament, with members from different political parties participating.
The vote was initiated by a group of lawmakers who accused their colleagues of being too sympathetic towards China, a claim vehemently denied by the targeted individuals. Proponents of the vote argue that it is crucial to maintain Taiwan’s independence and sovereignty by distancing themselves from any pro-China sentiments.
On the other hand, those lawmakers who were targeted argue that the vote is a political tactic to suppress differing opinions and stifle democracy. They claim that Taiwan should focus on maintaining stable relations with China for economic and security reasons.
This vote has highlighted the deep-rooted political divisions within Taiwan, with tensions running high between those advocating for a stronger stance against China and those favoring a more conciliatory approach.
The aftermath of this vote is likely to have lasting repercussions on Taiwan’s political landscape, potentially influencing future policies regarding China and shaping relationships within the Parliament. The divide caused by this vote underscores the complex and delicate balance Taiwan must navigate in its relationship with China.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “How a vote targeting ‘pro-China’ lawmakers has split Taiwan”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.