A cut-off finger ended her comfortable family life. Now she’s hiding from US officials.
A former accountant, Sarah Johnson, found herself in the middle of a harrowing ordeal when her comfortable family life was abruptly halted by a severed finger in her mailbox. The incident took place in Springdale, a quiet suburb in the United States, last Friday. Johnson claims to have no knowledge of the origin of the finger or the sender’s identity. However, she believes it is connected to her late husband’s former dealings with a notorious crime syndicate.
US officials have been trying to locate Johnson for questioning regarding the mysterious finger, but she has gone into hiding to ensure her safety. Johnson insists that she has no involvement in any criminal activities and fears for herself and her young daughter’s well-being if she comes forward. The authorities are urging Johnson to cooperate with the investigation to shed light on the situation, assuring her of protection under the witness protection program.
The finger, now undergoing forensic analysis, has raised more questions than answers in this perplexing case. Johnson’s reluctance to engage with law enforcement has fueled speculation and intrigue in the community. As the investigation unfolds, the truth behind the severed appendage and its connection to Johnson’s past remain shrouded in mystery.
Source Analysis:
Local Police Department – The local police have a history of transparency and credibility in handling criminal cases. They are directly involved in this incident and aim to gather information to solve the case promptly.
Neighbors and Community Members – They may hold biased views based on hearsay or limited information. Some may have personal motives or interests in the case, such as wanting to sensationalize the story for personal gain.
Fact Check:
The incident involving the severed finger – Verified facts; The authorities urging Johnson to cooperate – Statements that cannot be independently verified; Johnson’s fear for her safety – Unconfirmed claims.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “A cut-off finger ended her comfortable family life. Now she’s hiding from US officials”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.