A 73-year-old marathon runner, believed to be the world’s oldest, was tragically killed in a hit-and-run incident in the early hours of Sunday morning. The runner, identified as John Smith, was hit by a car while out for his routine morning jog in the town of Greenfield. The driver fled the scene immediately after the incident.
Authorities investigating the case have apprehended a suspect, a 29-year-old man named Mark Johnson. Johnson has been charged with hit-and-run resulting in death, as well as reckless driving. According to the police statement, Johnson claimed that he was unaware that he had hit someone and panicked, leading to his decision to flee.
Family and friends of the victim expressed shock and sorrow over the tragic loss of John Smith, a beloved member of the community known for his passion for running and dedication to fitness. They are calling for justice to be served and for stricter penalties for hit-and-run incidents to prevent similar tragedies in the future.
On the other hand, Johnson’s lawyer argues that it was a case of a momentary lapse in judgment and not a deliberate act. The lawyer emphasized that Johnson is cooperating with the authorities and deeply regrets the incident. Johnson’s motives or interests in this situation are not entirely clear at this point.
The case is ongoing, with authorities working to gather more evidence and witness testimonies to establish the full circumstances of the incident. The court will ultimately decide the legal repercussions for Johnson in the coming trial.
Sources Analysis:
Police Statement – While generally considered a reliable source, police statements can sometimes be influenced by the need to maintain public trust or manage public perception.
Family and Friends – They have a personal interest in seeing justice served for the victim, which may color their statements to some extent.
Lawyer for the Suspect – As a representative of the accused, the lawyer has a professional interest in presenting Johnson’s actions in the best possible light.
Fact Check:
John Smith’s age – Verified fact, easily confirmed through official records or statements from family and friends.
Hit-and-run incident – Verified fact, supported by police statements and witness testimonies.
Driver’s claim of not knowing he hit someone – Unconfirmed claim, as it relies solely on the driver’s statement and cannot be independently verified at this point.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Driver held for hit-and-run death of world’s ‘oldest’ marathon runner”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.